Doyle Files Longshore Maritime Action against Edison Chouest Offshore and Chevron USA

Maritime & Offshore Injury

Doyle LLP has filed a general maritime lawsuit against Edison Chouest Offshore (“Edison Chouest”) and Chevron USA, Inc. (“Chevron”), after our client suffered an electrocution while at work.  Suit is filed under the Longshore and Harbor Worker’s Compensation Act, a federal workers’ compensation program that covers injuries which take place in areas adjacent to navigable waterways for workers engaged in maritime employments.

As an employee of PMI Environmental, the plaintiff was cleaning the tank of a vessel owned by Edison Chouest and operated by Chevron while the vessel was at a dock on navigable waters of the United States. During this particular instance of tank maintenance, the lights in the tank went out. With a light in one hand, plaintiff reached and triggered a relay button which immediately sent 110 volts of electricity through his body, causing serious and debilitating pains. Immediately, our client’s right arm went numb and doctors note signs of continuing neuropathic issues.

The acts and omissions of Edison Chouest and Chevron constitute negligence and negligence per se by them failing to act in a reasonably prudent manner after the catastrophe. Gross negligence also took place as the corporations, acting through employees, agents, and representatives, recklessly and dangerously failed to carry out the safety obligations which would have prevented our client’s impairment and possible future disfigurement.

As is normal in such injurious situations, our client also suffered a loss of earning capacity and endures extensive medical expenses, both past and future.

If you or someone you love has suffered injury on or near a vessel and believe the claim involves the Longshore Act, Jones Act, or another possible area of maritime law, contact the admiralty attorneys of Doyle. Our firm has the incomparable experience, qualification, and reputation needed to strive for the largest recovery possible for your loss.

Lawsuit Begins Against Richardson Stevedoring and Street Brothers Ready Mix For Injuries Resulting From Unsafe Conditions Aboard Their Dredge Vessel

Maritime & Offshore Injury, New Filings

Doyle LLP has filed a Jones Act and general maritime lawsuit against Richardson Stevedoring & Logistics, Inc, (“Richardson”) and Street Brothers Ready Mix (“Steet Brothers”), to collect legal debt and damages owed to the plaintiff due to the negligent and unseaworthy conditions aboard defendants’ vessel.

Our client, a diligent but overworked crewman, was employed aboard the defendants’ dredge vessel when he suffered a heart attack.  As owner and operator of the vessel, the defendants had the duty to keep the vessel in seaworthy condition.  “Unseaworthiness “ is a strict  liability action and occurs when a crewman is insured because of unsafe conditions, such as; unprotected workplaces, foreign substances on decks, and even what took place in this situation – an insufficient amount of crewman.

The undermanned condition aboard placed strenuous labor on the backs of a few seaman and is the legal cause of our client’s injuries. This condition could have been easily corrected or avoided and accordingly, Richardson is also being held accountable for its negligence and negligence per se under the Jones Act.

As is all too common with maritime injuries, our client was unable to immediately return to work. The law provides that seaman injured while at sea are entitled to maintenance and cure from their employers. Maintenance payment covers room and board expense until maximum recovery is reached, while cure is payment for medical expenses.  The defendants willfully ignored our client’s need to receive ongoing maintenance and cure despite plain indications of the necessity.

At the time of the our client’s injury, he was a healthy, able-bodied working man, but now suffers continuing physical impairment along with lost earnings that will continue into his future. But this plaintiff’s needs will be thoroughly litigated. For decades, Doyle LLP has been assisting individuals suffering catastrophic injuries, career-ending injuries, and wrongful death on all kinds of vessels across the world.

If you or a loved one is a crewman and has been injured while on or near navigable waters, contact the lawyers of Doyle LLP for immediate assistance.

Supreme Court May Take Up The Jones Act Again

Maritime & Offshore Injury

The Jones Act is an extremely important law for anyone who works on the sea. It allows people who work as seamen and are injured on the job to have a trial by jury to sue for damages. It’s very similar to the same rights that railroad workers have. However, not everyone that works on the sea is classified as a seaman by the law.

According to a Supreme Court decision in 1995, a worker has to be out on the sea more than 30% of the time to be classified as a seaman. This means that many people who work on the docks and face many of the same dangers do not get the benefits of the Jones Act.

This issue may be taken up again by the Supreme Court soon. In 2008, a worker sued his employer after getting silicosis from sandblasting vessels. The fine sand got into his lungs and caused him to lose his job. His employer claimed that he didn’t qualify for Jones Act protections since he spent most of his time on the docks. In 2012, the worker died and his widow is now trying to take the case to the Supreme Court.

The worker did spend time out on the sea. When he wasn’t doing dock duties, he was taking pilots out to commercial vessels so local pilots could drive the boats out of Chesapeake Bay. The question is whether his boat maintenance work counts as being out on the sea.

Courts around the country are split about whether dock work counts as being out on the sea for the purposes of the Jones Act. The justices are scheduled to discuss whether to take the case or not. Resolving this issue in favor of the workers could open many companies to lawsuits.

Maritime Law

Maritime & Offshore Injury

Admiralty and maritime injury law is complex. Your rights to recover monetary compensation under the Jones Act and other maritime laws may be much different than those in any other type of injury case. We have the experience and expertise to help.

MARITIME INJURY LAWYER

Admiralty and maritime injury law is a complex area governed by a variety of federal statutes. Your rights and opportunities to recover monetary compensation under the Jones Act and other maritime laws may be much different than those in any other type of injury case.

In addition to hundreds of cases involving drilling rigs, barges, tugboats, other vessels, oil platforms and transport helicopters on U.S. waterways, our attorneys at Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers have handled numerous maritime law cases originating in international and foreign waters. If you need a lawyer to evaluate your maritime injury claim, contact our Texas-based firm today.

Jones Act and 905(b) Claims — Fatal Accidents — International Cases

We focus on serious maritime accidents and injuries, wherever they occur along the Gulf Coast or elsewhere. You can depend on our ability to handle:

Jones Act claims, as well as third-party personal injury litigation, for maritime workers injured working on U.S. waterways or docks.

Shore-based maritime injuries best addressed through 33 U.S.C.A. §905(b) claims against a vessel as a third party or party other than the employer.

International maritime injuries

Fatal maritime accidents leaving family members without financial support and companionship

Maritime Injury

Maritime & Jones Act Claims

  • Shore- Based Maritime Injuries
  • Maintenance and Cure
  • Reporting Maritime/Jones Act Injuries
  • Lawsuits Against Maritime Employers
  • Offshore Fracking Injuries

Serious Maritime Injury

  • Fatal Maritime Accidents
  • Maritime Line Injury Claims
  • Maritime Tool Injuries
  • Maritime Lifting Injuries
  • Injuries from Making UP or Unfacing a Barge
  • Maritime Gangway Injuries
  • Maritime Spinal, Neck and back Injuries
  • Maritime Head and Brain Injuries
  • Maritime Burn Injuries

Injured Seaman

  • Tankers, Cargo & Container Vessels
  • Tugboat & Barge Injury Attorneys
  • Dredging Vessel Injuries
  • Dive Boats & Divers
  • Workboat Injuries
  • Inland Marine Injuries

Defending The Rights Of Injured Oilfield Workers

  • Offshore Drilling Rig Injuries
  • Offshore Explosions
  • Fixed Platform Injuries

Maritime Accidents In US Waters

  • Texas
  • Louisiana
  • California
  • Alabama
  • Mississippi
  • New York
  • Alaska

International Maritime Injuries

 Maritime & Offshore Employer Disputes

  • Edison Chouest Maritime Disputes
  • Transocean Maritime Disputes

ABSOLUTELY NO COST TO YOU UNLESS WE WIN.

Our attorneys are prepared to take a serious look at your claim and potential case. Ours is one of a select few Texas law firms with extensive experience in international litigation, and we have clear strengths in personal injury, maritime, insurance bad faith, property insurance disputes, hurricane damage and other claims against powerful entities.

If you are interested in speaking with an attorney from Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers, please fill out the contact form or call one of the numbers listed for a free, no-obligation consultation.

Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers has filed suit against KEPPEL AMFELS, L.L.C. (“KEPPEL AMFELS”) for negligence leading to a workplace accident.

Maritime & Offshore Injury

Our client was dutifully employed as support personnel on an offshore rig operated by KEPPEL AMFELS. On or about August 9, 2013, our client was returning from a lunch break when Plaintiff’s hand was caught in a cable attached to a pulley that was not properly maintained and did not have adequate safety protections. Plaintiff immediately reported his injury, and was sent to the nearest hospital for immediate care for the issue.

These unsafe conditions led to an accident that resulted in the partial amputation of Plantiff’s left pinky finger and other damage to our client’s hand. Due to the accident, our client has suffered from more than physical and bodily injury. Plaintiff’s damages due to negligence have resulted in lasting physical and mental anguish, as well as continued difficulty in acquiring and performing work.

Previous to the incident, Plaintiff was an able bodied worker that is now forced to deal with severe limitations attributable to physical impairment. Plaintiff’s injury directly led to loss of earnings as the injury limited his capability to perform tasks at a pre-injury level. Due to reckless and dangerous behavior on the part of KEPPEL AMFELS and its representatives, our client seeks recompense for the numerous medical expenses and lasting effects associated with the injury. Through no fault of Plaintiff’s own, future prospects of financial self-support and life experience are now significantly diminished.

If you or someone you know believes they have experienced an injury attributable to negligence on the part of their employer, do not hesitate to contact Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers today for a consultation. Whether the effects of injury are immediate or long-term we may be able to help you.

1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 13