6 Feb

Houston Helicopter Crash Lawsuit: Wrongful Death Claims Against Tower Owner for Fatal Lighting Failure

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has filed a wrongful death lawsuit following a tragic helicopter crash in Houston, Texas, that claimed multiple lives when the aircraft collided with an unlit communications tower. The lawsuit alleges that SBA Towers XI, LLC failed to maintain required Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) obstruction lighting, failed to monitor the tower’s lighting system, and failed to correct the dangerous condition despite having notice of the outage.

Our firm represents surviving family members pursuing wrongful death and survival claims for a preventable tragedy. If your family has lost a loved one in an aviation accident caused by corporate negligence, contact us at (713) 571-1146 for a free case evaluation. We’ve recovered millions for our clients.

NO WIN, NO FEE.

The Fatal Accident: A Preventable Tragedy

In 2024, a helicopter conducting an evening flight over Houston struck a communications tower that was either completely unlit or improperly illuminated. The tower, required by federal law to be equipped with functioning obstruction lighting to warn pilots during nighttime conditions, had a failed lighting system that the defendants allegedly knew about but failed to repair.

The collision resulted in the helicopter crashing, killing the pilot and others aboard. The pilot leaves behind family members now forced to navigate life without their loved one—a loss that could have been prevented if the tower owner had fulfilled its basic safety obligations.

Federal Aviation Regulations and Tower Lighting Requirements

Under 14 CFR Part 77, the FAA requires that structures including communications towers above specific heights must be marked and lit to make them visible to aircraft. These obstruction lighting systems are mandatory safety measures designed to prevent exactly this type of fatal collision.

Tower owners have specific legal obligations: towers must be equipped with red obstruction lights that flash at regular intervals; owners must maintain monitoring systems that provide immediate notification when lights fail; immediate corrective action is required when outages are detected; and if repairs cannot be completed immediately, a Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) must be issued through the FAA to warn pilots of the unlit hazard.

SBA Towers XI, LLC allegedly failed in all of these obligations, creating a deadly trap for pilots navigating Houston’s airspace.

Corporate Negligence: Knowledge and Failure to Act

Our investigation reveals the defendants were aware—or should have been aware—that the tower’s obstruction lighting had failed. Modern tower lighting systems include monitoring technology that alerts owners immediately when lights malfunction. Despite access to this monitoring data, the defendants allegedly failed to take corrective action.

This represents reckless disregard for human life. When a company knows a tower poses an aviation hazard, knows the required safety lighting has failed, and chooses not to fix the problem or warn pilots, that company must be held fully accountable when tragedy occurs.

The failure to maintain proper obstruction lighting is particularly egregious because the solution is straightforward and inexpensive. Replacing bulbs, repairing electrical systems, or issuing NOTAMs costs relatively little compared to the value of human life.

Legal Liability and Wrongful Death Claims

SBA Towers XI, LLC is the primary defendant as tower owner and operator. The company’s alleged failures include: failure to maintain functioning obstruction lighting, failure to monitor the lighting system, failure to detect or respond to outages, failure to issue NOTAMs when lighting was inoperative, and negligent maintenance creating a hazardous condition.

Wrongful Death and Survival Claims Under Texas Law

Wrongful Death Claims are brought by surviving family members—spouse, children, and parents—seeking compensation for loss of companionship and society, mental anguish and grief, loss of care and advice, loss of financial support and inheritance, and funeral expenses.

Survival Actions are brought by the estate seeking damages the deceased could have recovered: pain and suffering before death, medical expenses, and lost wages from injury until death.

Texas law does not cap damages in wrongful death cases arising from aviation accidents and corporate negligence. Additionally, gross negligence—conscious disregard for safety—may warrant exemplary (punitive) damages to punish the defendant and deter similar conduct.

The Investigation Process

Our legal team is working with aviation safety experts, tower lighting specialists, and accident reconstruction professionals. Key evidence includes FAA tower registration documents, maintenance records, monitoring system data showing when lights failed, communications between tower owner and contractors, prior lighting outage complaints, NTSB investigation findings, and expert analysis of the collision.

Physical evidence must be preserved immediately. Critical evidence can be lost, destroyed, or degraded over time, which is why families should contact an experienced aviation wrongful death attorney as soon as possible.

Why This Death Was Preventable

The safety measures required to prevent tower strikes have been established for decades. Simple steps that should have been taken include regular inspection and testing of obstruction lights, automated monitoring systems with immediate alerts, prompt replacement of failed bulbs, backup lighting systems, immediate NOTAM issuance when repairs cannot be completed promptly, and adequate staffing to respond to failures 24/7.

The cost of these safety measures is negligible compared to their life-saving value. There is no excuse for allowing a tower to remain unlit when it poses a known hazard to aircraft.

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP: Proven Experience in Wrongful Death Cases

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has extensive experience representing families in complex wrongful death cases involving corporate negligence and safety violations. Our firm has recovered millions for our clients, and we are not afraid to take on major corporations that prioritize profits over safety.

Our Track Record:

$4.3 Million Verdict in Magnolia Cove Apartments Inadequate Security Case: We secured a landmark verdict when inadequate security at an apartment complex led to a tenant’s death during a robbery. Despite knowing about broken security gates, insufficient lighting, no functioning cameras, and a history of criminal activity, property owners failed to act.
Law Enforcement Misconduct Cases: Attorney Mike Doyle represents the family of Rhogena Nicholas and Dennis Tuttle, killed during a Houston Police Department no-knock raid based on a false warrant affidavit. We also filed a Rule 202 petition for the family of Mark Hopkins, a 22-year-old student killed during a College Station police raid.
Military Contractor Negligence: We filed suit against Tundra Strategies on behalf of U.S. servicemen when the contractor failed to properly screen an Afghan national with a documented history of threatening U.S. soldiers, leading to a serviceman being shot with a company-issued weapon.

These cases share a common theme: corporations that know about dangers yet fail to act. When their negligence results in death, we ensure full accountability.

Frequently Asked Questions

How long do I have to file a wrongful death lawsuit in Texas? Texas provides a two-year statute of limitations from the date of death. Consult an attorney immediately to ensure your claim is filed within the deadline, and begin evidence preservation as soon as possible.
Who can file a wrongful death claim in Texas? The deceased’s surviving spouse, children, and parents. If none file suit within three months, the estate’s personal representative may file on their behalf.
What is the difference between wrongful death and survival actions? Wrongful death compensates family members for their losses (companionship, mental anguish, support). Survival actions are brought by the estate for damages the deceased could have recovered (pain and suffering before death, medical expenses).
What damages can be recovered? Economic damages (financial support, funeral expenses, lost inheritance) and non-economic damages (companionship, mental anguish, care and advice). Gross negligence may warrant punitive damages. Generally no caps apply in these cases.
How long does a wrongful death lawsuit take? Aviation wrongful death cases typically take 18 months to several years depending on investigation complexity, defendants, discovery, and whether the case settles or goes to trial.
What are FAA tower lighting requirements? Under 14 CFR Part 77, towers above certain heights must have red obstruction lights operational 24/7. Tower owners must monitor the system and immediately correct failures, or issue a NOTAM warning pilots.
Who is liable when a helicopter hits an unlit tower? The tower owner and operator are primarily liable. Additional parties may include maintenance contractors and monitoring service providers, depending on their role in the lighting failure.
Can I sue both the tower owner and helicopter operator? Yes. Multiple parties can be liable depending on their negligence. However, when a tower is unlit in violation of FAA regulations, the tower owner bears primary responsibility.
How much does it cost to hire a wrongful death lawyer? Doyle Dennis Avery LLP works on contingency—no upfront costs and no attorney fees unless we recover compensation. We advance all litigation costs, allowing families to pursue justice without financial burden.
Will my case go to trial or settle? Most wrongful death cases settle before trial after discovery reveals evidence strength. However, we prepare every case for trial and are fully prepared to present to a jury if defendants refuse fair compensation.

Take Action to Protect Your Rights

If you have lost a loved one in an aviation accident caused by corporate negligence, time is critical. Evidence must be preserved, investigations must begin immediately, and claims must be filed within strict deadlines.

Contact us today:

Phone: (713) 571-1146

Toll-Free: (888) 571-1001

No amount of money can bring back your loved one. But holding negligent companies accountable provides financial security, validates that your loved one’s life mattered, and may prevent similar tragedies. Let us fight for your family while you focus on healing.

2 Feb

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Files Lawsuit Against Unicat Catalyst Technologies and Andy Cooper Engineering Limited for Catastrophic Industrial Accident

BB Tech

Firm News, News, Workplace Injury

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has filed a personal injury lawsuit in Harris County, Texas, on behalf of a client who suffered life-altering hand injuries while working at an industrial facility in Alvin, Texas. The lawsuit names Unicat Catalyst Technologies, LLC, a Texas-based company, and Andy Cooper Engineering Limited, an engineering company headquartered in the United Kingdom, as defendants.

This case highlights critical safety failures that occur far too often in industrial workplaces across Texas—failures that can devastate workers and their families in an instant. When companies fail to implement basic safety procedures like lockout/tagout protocols, the consequences can be catastrophic and permanent.

If you or a loved one has been seriously injured due to unsafe industrial conditions, equipment failures, or inadequate safety procedures, contact Doyle Dennis Avery LLP at (713) 571-1146 for a free case evaluation. Our experienced workplace injury attorneys fight to hold negligent companies accountable and recover the compensation injured workers deserve.

What Happened: Preventable Industrial Accident Causes Permanent Injuries

In December 2024, our client was working as an independent contractor electrician at Unicat’s industrial facility in Alvin, Texas. He was directed by representatives of the defendants to repair a large industrial mixer that had become blocked and inoperable. The client was explicitly assured that the equipment was safe to work on and that proper safety measures had been implemented.

While the client was performing the repair work, the industrial mixer unexpectedly and without warning powered on. The massive equipment trapped and crushed our client’s right hand, causing severe and permanent injuries that have fundamentally altered his life and ability to earn a living.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants:

Failed to implement proper lockout/tagout procedures required by federal OSHA regulations
Failed to provide adequate warnings about the equipment’s hazardous energy sources
Failed to properly train workers and contractors on equipment safety protocols
Negligently operated or allowed operation of equipment while repairs were underway
Created an unreasonably dangerous condition on the premises

As a result of these safety failures, our client suffered significant physical impairment, loss of earning capacity, substantial medical expenses, and long-term consequences that will affect him for the rest of his life.

Have you been injured in an industrial accident? Call Doyle Dennis Avery LLP today at (713) 571-1146 for experienced legal representation. We work on a contingency fee basis—No Win, No Fee.

Understanding Lockout/Tagout: Critical Safety Procedures That Save Lives

What Is Lockout/Tagout (LOTO)?

Lockout/tagout refers to specific safety procedures required by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to protect workers from hazardous energy during equipment maintenance and repair. Under OSHA’s Control of Hazardous Energy standard (29 CFR 1910.147), employers must establish procedures to ensure that equipment is properly shut down and cannot be restarted until maintenance or repair work is completed.

“Lockout” means placing a lock on an energy-isolating device to ensure that the equipment cannot be operated until the lock is removed. “Tagout” means placing a warning tag on the equipment indicating that it must not be operated.

Why Lockout/Tagout Procedures Are Essential

Industrial equipment contains multiple sources of hazardous energy that can cause catastrophic injuries or death if released unexpectedly:

Electrical energy from power sources and stored charges
Mechanical energy from moving parts, springs, and pressurized systems
Hydraulic energy from pressurized fluid systems
Pneumatic energy from compressed air or gas
Thermal energy from hot surfaces or chemicals
Chemical energy from reactive substances

When lockout/tagout procedures are not followed, workers performing maintenance face the terrifying risk of equipment suddenly activating—exactly what happened to our client. OSHA estimates that compliance with lockout/tagout standards prevents approximately 120 fatalities and 50,000 injuries annually.

Common Lockout/Tagout Violations

Despite decades of established safety standards, lockout/tagout violations remain among the most frequently cited OSHA violations year after year. Common failures include:

No written energy control program
Failure to train employees on LOTO procedures
Not using locks or tags on energy-isolating devices
Inadequate periodic inspections of energy control procedures
Failure to identify all energy sources
Not verifying that equipment is de-energized before work begins
Allowing equipment to be operated while maintenance is underway

Third-Party Liability: Your Rights as an Independent Contractor

Why Independent Contractor Status Matters

Our client’s status as an independent contractor—rather than a direct employee of Unicat or Andy Cooper Engineering—is legally significant. Unlike employees who are typically limited to workers’ compensation benefits for workplace injuries, independent contractors injured due to third-party negligence can pursue full personal injury lawsuits.

This means independent contractors can recover:

Full economic damages with no statutory caps
Past and future lost wages and earning capacity
Past and future medical expenses
Pain and suffering
Mental anguish
Physical impairment and disfigurement
Loss of enjoyment of life

Multiple Parties Can Be Held Accountable

In workplace injury cases involving independent contractors, multiple parties may share liability:

Property Owners: Companies that own the facility where the injury occurred have a duty to maintain safe premises and warn contractors of known hazards.
Equipment Owners/Operators: The company operating the dangerous equipment must ensure proper safety procedures are followed.
General Contractors: If a general contractor hired the injured worker, they may be liable for failing to coordinate safety measures.
Equipment Manufacturers: If defective design or manufacturing contributed to the accident, product liability claims may apply.
Engineering Companies: Firms that designed, installed, or maintain equipment can be liable for negligent engineering or inadequate safety specifications.

In this case, both the Texas-based facility operator (Unicat) and the UK-based engineering company (Andy Cooper Engineering Limited) are named as defendants because both allegedly contributed to the unsafe conditions that caused our client’s injuries.

International Defendants: Holding Foreign Companies Accountable

Unique Challenges of Cross-Border Litigation

One defendant in this case, Andy Cooper Engineering Limited, is a foreign corporation based in the United Kingdom. Lawsuits involving international defendants present complex legal challenges that require specialized knowledge and experience.

Key issues in international litigation include:

Jurisdiction: Establishing that Texas courts have the legal authority to hear claims against a foreign company requires showing sufficient connections between the defendant and Texas, such as conducting business in the state, having contracts with Texas companies, or causing injury in Texas.
Service of Process: Serving legal papers on foreign defendants requires compliance with international treaties, particularly the Hague Service Convention, which establishes procedures for serving documents across international borders.
Discovery: Obtaining evidence from foreign companies can be complicated by differences in legal systems, language barriers, and international discovery rules under treaties like the Hague Evidence Convention.
Enforcement: If a judgment is obtained against a foreign defendant, enforcing that judgment may require additional proceedings in the defendant’s home country.

Doyle Dennis Avery’s Experience With International Defendants

Despite these challenges, Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has extensive experience navigating complex international litigation. Our firm understands how to pursue claims against foreign companies while ensuring that injured workers have access to justice in U.S. courts.

We don’t let international borders shield negligent companies from accountability. Whether defendants are located in Texas, elsewhere in the United States, or abroad, we have the resources and expertise to hold them responsible when their conduct causes preventable injuries to American workers.

Injured by a company operating internationally? Contact Doyle Dennis Avery LLP at (713) 571-1146. We have the experience to handle complex international litigation.

Workplace Injuries at Industrial Facilities: Common Causes and Legal Rights

Types of Industrial Workplace Accidents

Industrial facilities present numerous hazards that can cause catastrophic injuries when safety procedures fail:

Equipment and Machinery Accidents: Injuries from industrial mixers, conveyors, presses, grinders, lathes, and other heavy machinery often result in amputations, crush injuries, and severe lacerations.
Falls from Heights: Workers on elevated platforms, scaffolding, or catwalks face serious fall risks, especially when proper fall protection is not provided.
Electrical Accidents: Contact with high-voltage equipment, faulty wiring, or inadequate lockout procedures can cause electrocution, burns, and cardiac injuries.
Chemical Exposures: Industrial facilities often use toxic or corrosive chemicals that can cause burns, respiratory injuries, poisoning, or long-term health effects.
Explosions and Fires: Oil and gas facilities, refineries, and chemical plants face particular risks of catastrophic explosions when safety systems fail.
Struck-By Accidents: Workers can be struck by moving equipment, falling objects, or vehicles operating in confined industrial spaces.
Confined Space Accidents: Insufficient oxygen, toxic atmospheres, or engulfment hazards in tanks, vessels, or other confined spaces cause serious injuries and fatalities.

Your Legal Rights After an Industrial Accident

If you’ve been injured in an industrial workplace accident, you may have multiple avenues for compensation:

Workers’ Compensation (for employees): If you’re a direct employee, you’re typically entitled to workers’ compensation benefits covering medical expenses and partial wage replacement, regardless of fault.
Third-Party Claims: Even if you receive workers’ compensation, you may be able to pursue additional claims against negligent third parties, such as equipment manufacturers, contractors, or property owners.
Independent Contractor Claims: If you’re not a direct employee, you can pursue full personal injury lawsuits against all negligent parties without workers’ compensation limitations.
Product Liability Claims: If defective equipment or machinery contributed to your injury, you may have claims against manufacturers or distributors.

Damages in Catastrophic Workplace Injury Cases

Economic Damages

Medical Expenses: Industrial accidents often require extensive medical treatment including emergency care, surgery, hospitalization, rehabilitation, prosthetics, and ongoing care. You can recover both past medical bills and future medical expenses reasonably certain to be incurred.
Lost Wages and Earning Capacity: When catastrophic injuries prevent you from returning to your previous work, you can recover compensation for lost income. This includes not just wages lost to date, but also your diminished future earning capacity if permanent impairment prevents you from performing the same work or requires career changes.
Vocational Rehabilitation: Costs of retraining or education to enter a new career field after disabling injuries can be recovered.

Non-Economic Damages

Physical Impairment: Compensation for permanent loss of bodily function, such as loss of use of a hand, reduced mobility, or chronic pain.
Disfigurement: Scarring, amputation, and other permanent changes to physical appearance warrant separate compensation.
Pain and Suffering: Both past and future physical pain caused by the injury and subsequent medical treatment.
Mental Anguish: Psychological suffering including depression, anxiety, PTSD, and emotional distress resulting from the injury and its life-altering consequences.
Loss of Enjoyment of Life: Compensation for inability to engage in activities and hobbies you previously enjoyed.

Why Experience Matters: Doyle Dennis Avery’s Track Record

Over $500 Million Recovered for Injured Workers

The attorneys at Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Trial Lawyers have decades of combined experience handling complex workplace injury cases. We have successfully represented injured workers in cases involving:

Maritime and Jones Act injuries to seamen and offshore workers
FELA railroad injuries to train crews and track workers
Construction site accidents and falls
Oil and gas refinery explosions
Industrial equipment failures
Third-party liability claims
International defendants

Our firm’s experience with high-stakes litigation, complex technical evidence, and multi-million dollar cases gives our clients a significant advantage when facing well-funded corporate defendants.

Contingency Fee Representation: No Win, No Fee

We understand that injured workers facing mounting medical bills and lost income cannot afford to pay hourly attorney fees. That’s why Doyle Dennis Avery LLP works on a contingency fee basis. You pay no attorney fees unless we recover compensation for you. We advance all case costs and expenses, so you risk nothing by pursuing the justice you deserve.

Call (888) 571-1001 today for a free case evaluation. Let our experienced workplace injury attorneys fight for the compensation you deserve.

Frequently Asked Questions About Workplace Injury Claims in Texas

1. What should I do immediately after a serious workplace injury?

Seek immediate medical attention—your health is the top priority. If possible, document the accident scene with photographs and identify any witnesses. Report the injury to your employer or the property owner. Preserve any equipment, clothing, or other physical evidence. Contact an experienced workplace injury attorney as soon as possible to protect your legal rights.

2. How long do I have to file a workplace injury lawsuit in Texas?

Texas law imposes strict deadlines for filing personal injury lawsuits, typically two years from the date of injury. However, certain circumstances can shorten or extend this deadline. Because investigating and building a strong case takes time, it’s critical to contact an attorney as soon as possible after your injury.

3. Can I sue if I was working as an independent contractor when I was injured?

Yes. Unlike employees who are generally limited to workers’ compensation benefits, independent contractors injured due to third-party negligence can file full personal injury lawsuits against responsible parties. This often allows for greater compensation than workers’ compensation would provide.

4. What if I was partially at fault for my accident?

Texas follows a modified comparative negligence rule. You can still recover damages even if you were partially at fault, as long as your fault is 50% or less. However, your recovery will be reduced by your percentage of fault. For example, if you’re found 20% at fault, your damages award would be reduced by 20%.

5. Who can be held liable for my workplace injury?

Multiple parties may share liability depending on your specific circumstances: property owners, equipment owners/operators, general contractors, subcontractors, equipment manufacturers, engineering firms, and other third parties whose negligence contributed to your injury. An experienced attorney can identify all potentially liable parties.

6. What is lockout/tagout and why does it matter?

Lockout/tagout (LOTO) refers to OSHA-mandated safety procedures that control hazardous energy during equipment maintenance and repair. When companies fail to follow LOTO procedures, workers face serious risks of injury or death from unexpected equipment activation. LOTO violations are among the most frequently cited OSHA violations and often form the basis for workplace injury lawsuits.

7. How do I prove my workplace injury case?

Proving workplace injury cases requires establishing that the defendant owed you a duty of care, breached that duty through negligence, and directly caused your injuries. Evidence may include accident reports, OSHA violations, safety procedure documentation, expert testimony about industry standards, medical records, witness statements, and physical evidence from the accident scene.

8. Can I sue a foreign company that caused my injury in Texas?

Yes, foreign companies can be sued in Texas courts if they have sufficient connections to Texas, such as conducting business in the state or causing injury here. However, international litigation involves complex jurisdictional and procedural issues requiring experienced legal counsel familiar with international law and treaty requirements.

9. What compensation can I recover in a workplace injury lawsuit?

You may be able to recover economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, rehabilitation costs) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, mental anguish, physical impairment, disfigurement, loss of enjoyment of life). The specific damages available depend on the facts of your case and applicable law.

10. How long does a workplace injury lawsuit take?

The timeline varies significantly based on case complexity, the severity of injuries, the number of defendants, and whether the case settles or goes to trial. Some cases resolve in months through settlement negotiations, while complex cases involving international defendants or catastrophic injuries may take one to three years or more to reach conclusion.

11. What if my employer pressures me not to report my injury or file a claim?

Any attempt by an employer to discourage you from reporting an injury, seeking medical care, or pursuing legal rights is unlawful. Texas law prohibits retaliation against workers who report injuries or file workers’ compensation claims. Document any such pressure and consult with an attorney immediately.

12. Will I have to go to court?

Many workplace injury cases settle before trial through negotiations with defendants and their insurance companies. However, if a fair settlement cannot be reached, your attorney must be prepared to take your case to trial. Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has extensive trial experience and the resources to litigate cases fully when necessary.

Take Action: Contact Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Today

Industrial workplace accidents can happen in seconds but create consequences that last a lifetime. When companies fail to implement basic safety procedures like lockout/tagout protocols, workers pay the price with catastrophic injuries, lost livelihoods, and permanent disabilities.

If you’ve suffered an injury due to negligence in the workplace, contact our experienced injury attorneys today for a free, confidential case evaluation. Our team will review your situation, explain your legal options, and help you determine the best path forward.

Don’t let corporations minimize your suffering or deny you the compensation you need for recovery. Learn more about your rights after a workplace injury and how our firm can help protect them.

Call us at (713) 571-1146 or complete our online contact form to schedule your free consultation with our injury legal team.

4 Apr

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Files Negligence Lawsuit Against Liberty Energy Inc. for Workplace Tractor Trailer Injury in New Mexico

BB Tech

Firm News, News, Workplace Injury

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP has filed a lawsuit against Liberty Energy Inc. on behalf of its client, a tractor truck driver who suffered severe injuries while transporting cargo at Liberty Energy’s facility in New Mexico. The lawsuit, filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico, alleges that Liberty Energy’s negligence in loading and securing cargo led to a catastrophic injury that resulted in permanent harm to the client, including the traumatic amputation of his left thumb.

Case Background: Preventable Workplace Injury in the Energy Industry

On September 11, 2024, the client arrived at Liberty Energy’s facility to deliver a load of full sandboxes and receive an outbound load of empty sandboxes. These sandboxes, large containers used in hydraulic fracturing operations to store and transport sand, are substantial industrial equipment that require proper securing procedures to transport safely.

Negligent Loading Procedures

Instead of allowing our client to personally inspect and secure the cargo—a standard safety practice in the transportation industry—Liberty Energy employees assumed responsibility for loading and securing the cargo onto the truck. Liberty Energy personnel assured our client the cargo was properly secured and instructed him to immediately exit the facility so that another cargo could be processed.

This rushed approach to cargo handling demonstrates a concerning prioritization of operational speed over worker safety, a pattern that can lead to devastating consequences in industrial settings.

Catastrophic Injury from Improperly Secured Cargo

Upon stopping at a safe location outside the facility to inspect the load, as is standard practice for professional truck drivers, the client discovered that the cargo had been improperly secured. Tragically, as he attempted to address the safety issue, an unsecured sandbox fell, crushing the client’s left hand and causing a traumatic immediate amputation of the left thumb.

The severity of the injury necessitated emergency medical evacuation, and the client was airlifted to Midland, Texas, for specialized surgical intervention. Despite medical treatment, the client has suffered permanent disfigurement and disability.

Legal Claims Against Liberty Energy Inc.

The lawsuit filed by Doyle Dennis Avery LLP alleges multiple forms of negligence against Liberty Energy Inc., including:

Specific Negligence Allegations

Improper Loading Procedures: Failure to correctly load and secure the sandboxes according to industry standards and safety regulations
Inadequate Training: Failure to properly train employees in safe cargo loading and securing techniques
Insufficient Safety Protocols: Lack of comprehensive safety procedures for loading operations
Rushed Operations: Prioritizing operational efficiency over safety by hurrying the client off the premises
Failure to Supervise: Inadequate supervision of loading personnel
Misrepresentation of Safety: Falsely assuring the client that the load was properly secured when it was not

Damages Sought for the Injured Worker

As a result of Liberty Energy’s alleged negligence, our client has suffered:

Permanent physical impairment and disfigurement
Loss of earning capacity and future income
Severe physical pain and suffering
Emotional distress and mental anguish
Significant past and future medical expenses
Diminished quality of life

Workplace Safety in the Energy Transportation Sector

The energy industry, particularly in regions like New Mexico and Texas where oil and gas operations are prevalent, relies heavily on commercial transportation to move equipment and materials. This case highlights several critical safety issues within this sector:

Cargo Securement Regulations

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) regulations provide detailed requirements for properly securing cargo. These regulations exist specifically to prevent the type of accident that injured our client. Energy companies that load cargo onto commercial vehicles have a responsibility to understand and follow these regulations.

Shared Responsibility for Load Security

While drivers ultimately bear responsibility for their loads while on public roadways, companies that perform loading operations have a duty to conduct these operations safely. When a company takes control of the loading process, as Liberty Energy did in this case, they assume a significant portion of this responsibility.

Time Pressure and Safety Corners

High-demand operations like those in the energy sector often create production pressure that can lead to safety shortcuts. Companies must ensure that operational efficiency never comes at the expense of worker safety.

The Impact of Traumatic Hand Injuries

Traumatic hand injuries like the amputation suffered by our client have profound and lasting effects on every aspect of an individual’s life:

Occupational Limitations

Professional drivers rely on full manual dexterity to perform their jobs safely. Hand injuries can severely limit or end careers in this field. The loss of a thumb is particularly devastating, as it significantly impairs grasping ability and overall hand function.

Daily Life Challenges

Hand injuries affect virtually every aspect of daily living, from basic self-care to household tasks to recreational activities. These injuries often require significant lifestyle adaptations and may necessitate assistance with everyday activities.

Psychological Impact

Beyond the physical trauma, catastrophic injuries often cause significant psychological effects, including post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and anxiety. The sudden change in physical capability and career prospects can also lead to issues with self-image and identity.

Legal Remedies for Injured Transportation Workers

Workers injured in the transportation industry while performing services for energy companies may have several potential avenues for compensation:

Personal Injury Claims

As in this case, workers may pursue personal injury claims against negligent companies when their actions directly cause harm. These claims require demonstrating that the company failed to exercise reasonable care and that this failure caused the injury.

Workers’ Compensation

Depending on employment status and jurisdiction, injured workers may also be eligible for workers’ compensation benefits, which can provide medical coverage and partial wage replacement regardless of fault.

Third-Party Claims

In some situations, parties beyond the immediate employer may share liability for workplace injuries. This might include equipment manufacturers, maintenance contractors, or other entities involved in creating hazardous conditions.

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP’s Commitment to Injured Workers

At Doyle Dennis Avery LLP, we are dedicated to fighting for the rights of injured workers in the transportation and energy sectors. Our experienced attorneys understand the complex legal landscape surrounding workplace injuries and have a proven track record of holding companies accountable for negligent practices.

We recognize that behind every case like this is a real person whose life has been permanently altered by preventable circumstances. Our firm is committed to not only securing fair compensation for our clients but also to driving industry-wide safety improvements through legal accountability.

Protecting Your Rights After a Workplace Injury

If you or a loved one has suffered injuries due to employer negligence, whether as a tractor truck driver or in another capacity, it’s essential to understand your legal rights:

Seek immediate medical attention for your injuries and ensure they are properly documented
Report the incident to appropriate supervisors and authorities
Document everything related to the accident, including photographs of hazardous conditions when possible
Preserve evidence such as work orders, communications, and witness information
Consult with an experienced workplace injury attorney before providing statements to insurance companies or accepting any settlements

Contact Doyle Dennis Avery LLP for a Free Consultation

Workplace injuries require specialized legal expertise, particularly when they involve the transportation and energy sectors. At Doyle Dennis Avery LLP, our attorneys have the knowledge, resources, and determination to help you navigate the complex legal process and fight for the compensation you deserve.

Don’t let corporations minimize your suffering or deny you the compensation you need for recovery. Learn more about your rights after a workplace injury and how our firm can help protect them.

Call us at (713) 571-1146 or complete our online contact form to schedule your free consultation with our injury legal team.

30 Dec

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Secures $4.3 Million Verdict in Fatal Apartment Complex Security Case | Texas Negligent Security Lawyers

BB Tech

Firm News, News, Personal Injury

Our premises liability and negligent security attorneys have secured a landmark $4.3 million verdict in Harris County District Court, holding apartment complex owners accountable for inadequate security that led to the tragic death of M. Bonilla. This case (No. 2017-08414) demonstrates our firm’s commitment to justice for families affected by negligent apartment security.

Fatal Security Failure

This landmark case arose after intruders gained access to Magnolia Cove Apartments due to severely inadequate security measures, leading to M. Bonilla’s tragic death. Our client, N. Ardon, brought claims individually, as representative of M. Bonilla’s estate, and as next friend of minor E. Bonilla.

Our investigation revealed critical security failures:

Broken security gates allowing unauthorized access
Insufficient lighting in common areas and parking lots
Lack of functioning security cameras
Absence of security patrols
History of criminal activity that went unaddressed

Through extensive discovery and expert testimony, our trial team proved that both APTMC, LLC (Magnolia Cove Apartments) and Gatesco, Inc. knew about security risks but failed to take appropriate action.

Understanding Apartment Complex Security Obligations

Texas law requires apartment owners to protect residents from foreseeable criminal acts. This includes:

Proper Access Control

Working security gates
Controlled entry systems
Secure locks and doors
Monitored access points

Adequate Lighting

Parking areas
Common walkways
Building entrances
Stairwells and corridors

Security Systems

Surveillance cameras
Alarm systems
Emergency response protocols
Security personnel when warranted

Crime Prevention

Regular security assessments
Criminal activity monitoring
Resident safety communications
Swift response to security concerns

Historic $4.3 Million Verdict Breakdown

The Harris County jury recognized the devastating impact of these security failures:

Individual Claims (N. Ardon):

$850,000 future damages
$450,000 past damages
Prejudgment interest from February 2017

Minor Child (E. Bonilla):

$1,250,000 future damages
$750,000 past damages
Additional prejudgment interest

Estate Claims (M. Bonilla):

$200,000 in damages
Associated interest and costs

Liability Distribution:

Magnolia Cove Apartments: 35%
Gatesco, Inc.: 65% (triggering joint and several liability)

Foreseeability of Criminal Activity

Our legal team proved the critical element of foreseeability through:

Prior criminal incidents at the complex
Police reports from surrounding area
Security expert testimony
Industry standard analysis
Crime statistics for the location

This evidence demonstrated that property owners knew or should have known about security risks but failed to act.

Legal Standards for Apartment Security

Texas courts recognize specific requirements for apartment security:

Duty of Care

Reasonable security measures
Regular maintenance of security features
Response to known risks
Protection of residents

Industry Standards

Access control systems
Professional security assessments
Crime prevention through environmental design
Emergency response protocols

Documentation Requirements

Security incident reports
Maintenance records
Resident complaints
Security system testing

Staff Training

Security awareness
Emergency procedures
Resident communication
Incident reporting

Impact on Texas Apartment Security Law

This verdict establishes important precedents:

Property Owner Accountability

Direct liability for security failures
Management company responsibility
Joint liability implications
Duty to maintain security systems

Security Measure Requirements

Modern security technology standards
Staffing obligations
Maintenance expectations
Response time requirements

Damage Calculations

Long-term impact consideration
Family member compensation
Estate recovery rights
Interest calculations

Protecting Your Rights After a Security Incident

If you’ve been affected by apartment complex security failures:

Immediate Actions

Ensure personal safety
Contact law enforcement
Document all evidence
Seek medical attention if needed

Documentation

Photograph security failures
Record incident details
Gather witness information
Keep all communications

Legal Considerations

Preserve evidence
Report to management
Contact experienced attorneys
Understand time limitations

Rights Protection

Don’t sign management documents
Maintain incident records
Consider temporary relocation
Document all expenses

How Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Can Help

Our firm specializes in:

Negligent security cases
Apartment complex liability
Wrongful death claims
Premises liability
Complex civil litigation

Our approach includes:

Thorough Investigation

Crime scene analysis
Security system evaluation
Historical incident review
Expert consultation

Evidence Gathering

Security records
Maintenance documents
Witness statements
Expert testimony

Legal Strategy

Multi-defendant litigation
Insurance coverage analysis
Damage modeling
Trial preparation

Contact Us Today

Free Consultation Available

Don’t wait – Texas law limits the time to file claims. Contact our experienced trial attorneys today to protect your rights and seek justice.

26 Oct

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP Represents the Family of Student Killed in Raid by College Station Police

BB Tech

Firm News, News, Personal Injury

Doyle Dennis Avery LLP recently filed a petition to open an investigation into the circumstances that caused the death of Mark Hopkins, a 22-year-old student in College Station, Texas.

On February 8, 2022, officers with the College Station police department executed a search warrant at an off-campus residence occupied by Mark, his girlfriend, and another student. The suit alleges that the warrant was based on an affidavit that falsely claimed there were Venmo transactions between Hopkins and Abraham Escobar, the target of the search warrant who police suspected of being a drug dealer. Escobar was neither an occupant of the home that was the subject of the search warrant, nor was he present at the time of its execution.

The lawsuit alleges that at or around 6:00 a.m., College Station PD used “flash bang” devices to enter the premises. Hopkins and his girlfriend awoke during the commotion and believed burglars had broken into their home. According to Mark’s girlfriend, a witness to the tragic events that morning, they did not hear any knocking or attempt by the raid members to identify themselves as police officers. Fearing for their safety, Mark grabbed his personal shotgun as he instructed his girlfriend to hide in the closet and call 911. After College Station PD forced entry into the couple’s bedroom, Mark’s girlfriend witnessed him fall to the ground after being repeatedly shot at by police officers, according to the lawsuit.

After many months of ignored requests for information by the City of College Station, the Hopkins family retained Aaron W. Perry and Doyle Dennis Avery LLP to uncover the truth of the matter. On October 9, 2023, Doyle Dennis Avery LLP filed a “Rule 202” petition on behalf of the Hopkins family in Brazos County, Texas. The family seeks to gain access to incident reports, investigative documents, and unabridged body camera footage to clarify the circumstances that led to Mark’s untimely end. Additionally, they hope that the investigation will facilitate the transparency necessary to clear Mark Hopkin’s name.

Ignoring safety protocols and basic civil rights can lead to grave consequences. Doyle Dennis Avery LLP strives to hold the individuals involved, as well as the systems that enable those individuals, accountable for their conduct. If you or a family member has been harmed by reckless conduct by police officer or other public official, contact us for a free evaluation of your potential claims.

1 2 3 … 45