Category Archives: Health & Life Insurance Bad Faith

Doyle LLP is pleased to announce new resources for military members and their families to provide information about burn pit exposure. From 2003 to 2013, thousands of military members were exposed to toxic materials burned on military bases with serious health consequences.

What’s the Background on Burn Pit Litigation?

Government contractors including Halliburton and KBR were given government contracts to dispose of waste on military bases in both Iraq and Afghanistan. The contractors improperly burned material in large open-air burn pits operated close to living and working areas. The result: Soldiers and deployed military members were exposed to harmful fumes and carcinogenic particles.

Doyle LLP is a leading burn pit law firm, representing military personnel who were negligently exposed to toxic substances. More than 100 cases have been filed throughout the United States against military contractors. In one case, a jury ruled in favor of 12 soldiers (represented by Doyle) against military contractor KBR in an $81 million judgment.

Every case is different and those who may have been exposed need to understand the risks; the signs and symptoms of illnesses; and their options if they fall ill. Doyle LLP has prepared interactive resources for military members and their families. The interactive information at Burn Pit Facts explains:

• Where burn pits were located: There were 251 burn pits in Iraq and 22 in Afghanistan as of 2010. The largest was at Joint Base Balad.

• Who was exposed: There were 25,000 personnel on some of the bases where burn pits were located.

• What was burned: More than 100 tons of potentially hazardous materials were burned daily at some of the bases in Iraq and Afghanistan. The materials being burned included heavy metals, medical waste, biohazard materials, banned chemicals, plastic water bottles, asbestos, tires, PVC pipes, pesticides and batteries.

• The health consequences of burn pits: Health effects include respiratory disorders, neurological disorders, cardiopulmonary disorders, skin problems, autoimmune conditions, and cancers. The fallout has been compared with Agent Orange.

• What your options are: Burn pit lawsuits were first filed in 2007. Today, there are a number of cases on file and a multi-district litigation established to manage the litigation.

Doyle is here to help victims who may have been exposed and family members of those affected. In addition to the facts page, you can also find more information, resources, and assistance by visiting our pages on:

• Burn Pit FAQ
• Burn Pit Resources
• Legal Help for Burn Pit Victims

Our attorneys offer free consultations on burn pit claims. Call today to schedule a consultation.

Doyle LLP has filed suit against Nationwide Property and Casualty (“Nationwide”) and its assigned claims adjuster for multiple violations of the Texas Insurance Code and related laws protecting consumers against fraud and other deceptive business practices.

Our client owns a wholesale distribution store and purchased insurance from Nationwide whereby the company agreed to provide coverage for the building, warehouse, inventory, and lost business income resulting from burglary.

On or about January 21, 2014, five suspects broke into the Property by smashing the glass with sledgehammers, threatened the employees with guns, and stole a substantial amount of money, inventory, and other items from the building. Plaintiff immediately filed an insurance claim for damages to the building, along with lost inventory, items and cash from the register, and more.

Nationwide responded by assigning consultants to Plaintiff’s file that were inadequate and improperly trained. These actions violated the Texas Insurance Code’s requirement to conduct an adequate investigation. Further, Nationwide utilized biased consultants that overlooked the extent of loss and grossly undervalued the damages it did accept. The insurance company also violated the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act and committed fraud by representing that certain damages were not covered under the Policy when in fact they were.

Given the repeated delays of payment, our client has been subjected to significant economic impact, worry, distress, and continuing economic and physical damage. In addition, this commercial business owner suffers continuing financial harm and damage as a result of the repeated delays.

If you believe you have endured improper delay or denials of a Texas commercial property insurance claim, contact Doyle LLP today for a free consultation.

Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers has filed suit against AFLAC (American Family Life Assurance Company of Columbus) alleging breach of contract, violation of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, violation of the Texas Insurance Code, violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), and fraud arising from the wrongful denial of disability benefits owed under an AFLAC Cancer Policy.

AFLAC’s policy required it to pay benefits if Doyle LLP’s Client was diagnosed with cancer or an associated cancerous condition after an initial 30-day waiting period.  However, when she was diagnosed with cancer, AFLAC refused to pay her claim.  AFLAC claimed that Doyle LLP’s Client was suffering from a pre-existing condition, even though no medical or other evidence supported the denial.

Unfortunately, AFLAC continued its denial even after the Plaintiff’s doctors provided medical documentation stating that the non-cancerous prior condition was in no way linked to – or a proper reason for – claiming that Doyle LLP’s Client had preexisting cancer.

The result of the denial has created an impact on the Plaintiff’s medical situation, including causing delay in surgical treatment and significant financial harm.  As a result, Doyle LLP is seeking unpaid medical and income benefits; emotional, financial, and physical damages caused by the delay in payment of benefits; attorneys’ fees, punitive damages, and treble damages under Texas law.

Doyle LLP is honored to represent this client in her fight against an insurance company who has refused to pay benefits owed under a disability or cancer policy. Contact us today if you or someone you know has had their claim for cancer or disability benefits denied by AFLAC or another insurer.

Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers has filed suit against UNUM Life Insurance Company and the UNUM Group (“UNUM”) alleging violations of the Texas Insurance Code, the Deceptive Trade Practices Act (“DTPA”), fraud, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing by wrongfully denying its insured’s disability claim. 

UNUM was responsible for handling the payment of disability benefits after a 2013 aggravation of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”).  The suit alleges that UNUM ignored medical records from multiple treating physicians demonstrating the severity of the disability, and instead would only consider the opinions of a physician that UNUM hired to offer opinions on whether Doyle LLP’s Client was qualified for disability under the policy.

Doyle LLP’s Client had no choice but to hire a lawyer to represent him in assisting to require the insurance company to pay its owed benefits.  Unfortunately, because of the lengthy delay in payment of benefits and eventual denial, Doyle LLP’s client suffered from pain and suffering, financial turmoil, and mental anguish.

Doyle LLP focuses its practice on representing disabled workers who are injured due to the wrongful conduct of workers’ compensation insurers, long term and short term disability insurers, and health insurers. If you or someone you know has suffered as a result of bad faith conduct by an insurance carrier, contact us

Doyle LLP Trial Lawyers has filed suit against the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company and the UNUM Group (“UNUM”) alleging violations of the Texas Insurance Code, the Deceptive Trade Practices Act, fraud, and breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing due to its wrongful handling of Doyle LLP Client’s disability insurance claim.

UNUM was responsible for handling Doyle LLP Client’s disability benefits that he bought privately in order to protect himself should he become disabled. He began suffering from normal pressure hydrocephalus and eventually could no longer perform his duties as a doctor. Despite medical records confirming his disability, UNUM wrongfully relied on the doctor it hired to deny Doyle LLP Client’s claim.

Doyle LLP’s Client had no choice but to hire a lawyer to attempt to require the insurance company to make payment. However, UNUM stood by its denial of benefits. As a result, Doyle LLP’s Client has suffered physical, financial and emotional damages.

Doyle LLP focuses its practice on representing disabled workers who are injured due to the wrongful conduct of workers’ compensation insurers, long term and short term disability insurers, and health insurers. If you or someone you know has suffered as a result of bad faith conduct by an insurance carrier, contact us.